By Werner Abraham, C. Jan-Wouter Zwart
This publication takes up a number of normal syntactic issues, which both yield diversified ideas in German, specifically, or which result in diverse conclusions for idea formation. one of many major issues is the truth that languages that let for wide scrambling among the 2 verbal poles, V-2 and V-last, have to combine discourse capabilities like thema and rhema into the grammatical description. this is often tried, by way of Minimalism, therefore extending the practical area. precise awareness is given to the asymmetrical scrambling habit of indefinites vs. definites and their semantic interpretation. comparable subject matters are: Transitive expletive sentences, different types of existential sentences with both BE or HAVE, the that-trace phenomenon and its semantics, destructive polarity goods, ellipsis and gapping, passivization, double negation ― all of that have large results either on distributional habit and semantic disambiguation, achieving a ways past results observable in English with its inflexible, ‘un-scrambable’ be aware order.
Read or Download Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology PDF
Similar language & grammar books
The 10 volumes of instruction manual of Pragmatics Highlights specialize in the main salient subject matters within the box of pragmatics, hence dividing its broad interdisciplinary spectrum in a clear and achievable manner. whereas the opposite volumes decide upon particular philosophical, cognitive, grammatical, cultural, variational, interactional, or discursive angles, this 7th quantity underlines the together constitutive relation among society and language use.
Do you need to ace your public conversing direction? All you must comprehend, together with the entire talents that can assist you develop into a convinced speaker and overcome talking nervousness, are completely coated within the problem OF powerful talking, 15e. a favourite with scholars, this most sensible vendor courses you thru six key "Speech making plans motion Steps".
What are the original features of signal languages that lead them to so interesting? What have fresh researchers came upon approximately them, and what do those findings let us know approximately human language extra more often than not? This thematic and geographic evaluation examines greater than 40 signal languages from around the globe.
Contents Preface to Fourth variation Preface to 3rd version Preface to moment version Preface to First version Author's Acknowledgements Publisher's Acknowledgements 1. What do sociolinguists learn? what's a sociolinguist? Why can we say a similar factor in several methods? What are the various methods we are saying issues?
- Frequency Effects in Language Representation TILSM 244/2 (Trends in Linguistics. Studies and Monographs [Tilsm])
- Norms and Usage in Language History, 1600–1900: A sociolinguistic and comparative perspective (Advances in Historical Sociolinguistics)
- The Present Perfect in Non-Native Englishes (Topics in English Linguistics)
- Languages of the World: An Introduction
- Translation in Anthologies and Collections (19th and 20th Centuries) (Benjamins Translation Library)
Extra resources for Issues in Formal German(ic) Typology
We can formulate this correlation in the following rule (on the basis of Cincque’s Clausal Accent Null Hypothesis): (30) Rule of default stress assignment The main stress of the sentence is assignable only after anaphoric destressing Consider the following sentence from German (again default accent in ): (31) daß ich den Mann/ihn gestern ti habe that I the man/him yesterday seen have The prosodically unmarked position of the pronominal or nominal object to the left of the adverb and the assignability of GA to the participle indicate that projection of maximal focus is allowed in (32) (see also Zwart 1997: 92): (32) Ich habe nur gesagt, [daß ich den Mann/ihn gestern habe] und nicht [daß ich mit ihm hätte] ‘I have only said that I saw the man/him yesterday, not that I would have talked to him’ Note that focus projection is blocked if the direct object is to the right of sentence adverbs, that is in its base position, where it is assigned contrastive stress: (33) Ich habe nur gesagt, daß ich gestern den / gesehen habe *(und nicht daß ich mit ihm gesprochen hätte).
If the adverb in (i) is attached to IP, the deﬁnites in (i) can have a scrambled status, maintaining the analysis proposed here. The optionality of destressing A central problem to be solved with respect to scrambling is optionality. If the deﬁnite object in (28a–c) is indeed marked for anaphoric destressing by some abstract feature, it is not entirely clear why scrambling movement is not always forced. Consider (36): (36) daß ich gestern den Mann gesehen habe In (36) the assumed licensing requirement of the AF-feature is disrespected, as the direct object stays to the right of the sentence adverb, that is in situ, according to our assumptions.
Also, D-linking has been argued to relate expressions with their potential antecedents in terms of phi or R-features (Lenerz 1993; Neeleman & Reinhart 1998 or Haegeman 1996). Although I do not see Dlinking as an instance of agreement, the AF-position is clearly referential and as such cannot be an operator position. Both de Hoop & Kosmeijer (1995: 152) and Haegeman (1996) argue that the typological distinction between A and A′-position has to be disassociated from L-relatedness as in Chomsky (1993: 28).