By Oliver Black
Combining rigorous philosophical research with a deep wisdom of legislation, this learn of agreements illuminates felony doctrine by way of philosophical idea and vice versa. opposed to the existing philosophical view of agreements, the ebook argues that they're to be understood in phrases now not of gives you yet of supply and attractiveness. themes lined contain the duties linked to agreements; the sensible reasoning that leads events to make and practice agreements; the relation among contract and goal; and the explanations the nation has to intrude in agreements. There also are separate chapters dedicated to doctrines of contract within the legislation of agreement, pageant and conspiracy.
Read or Download Agreements: A Philosophical and Legal Study PDF
Best philosophy books
The thinker David Hume was once born in Edinburgh, Scotland on April 26, 1711. identified for his re-thinking of causation, morality, and faith, Hume has left a long-lasting mark on heritage. James Madison, the "father" of the U. S. structure, drew seriously on Hume's writing, specifically his "Idea of ideal Commonwealth," which combated the assumption on the time that an enormous state couldn't maintain a republican kind of govt.
The assumption of Continental Philosophy hasn't ever been competently defined in philosophical phrases. during this brief and fascinating publication Simon Glendinning makes an attempt ultimately to be triumphant the place others have failed--although no longer via giving an account of its inner cohesion yet through displaying in its place why no such account should be given.
What's the position of person selection and end result in a post-Holocaust international of constant genocidal ethnic detoxification? Is "identity" now a last-ditch cultural protection of ethnic nationalisms and competing fundamentalisms? In a weather of quick details, loose markets and attainable ecological catastrophe, how can we outline "rights," self-interest and civic tasks?
Dale Jacquette charts the improvement of Schopenhauer's rules from the time of his early dissertation at the Fourfold Root of the primary of enough cause throughout the versions of his magnum opus the realm as Will and illustration to his later collections of philosophical aphorisms and festival essays.
- Petite Philosophie Du Velo (French Edition)
- Comprendre Schopenhauer
- Le temps dont je suis l'hypothèse
- Heidegger. Les femmes, le nazisme et la philosophie
- Lectures on Ethics (The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant)
- Principles of Human Knowledge and Three Dialogues (Oxford World's Classics)
Additional info for Agreements: A Philosophical and Legal Study
It is not the case that if Y does not do Ay then X does Ax. If (4) then, if X complies with his promise, X complies with the agreement. 44 One response to (6) is to point out that, if X fails to do Ax, he runs the risk of failing to comply with the promise: that happens if Y does Ay. ) The response fails for two reasons: the conditional just stated both has a false antecedent in some instances and is consistent with (6). A better response distinguishes kinds of compliance. Here compliance with promises is at issue, but the same distinction applies to compliance with agreements, obligations and so on; given the importance of compliance in an account of agreement and of its relations to other phenomena, the response has an interest beyond that of the present objection.
Once the agreement is made, X’s reasoning to performance may instantiate the schema: (i) I am obligated to f; (ii) other things are equal; so (iii) I will f. Preliminary reasoning to the relevant instance of (i) may use the premiss ‘If I and Y agree that , then I am obligated to do Ax’; this is an indexical variant of the principle discussed in Chapter 3 and, like that principle, is subject to provisos. Given that, as explained in Chapter 3, X’s obligation to do Ax is grounded in a reason for him to do Ax, X may alternatively reason in accordance with a variant of the schema, which replaces (i) with: there is a reason for me to f.
2 n. 51 below. Prichard (2002f), 259 says that ‘undertake’, ‘promise’ and ‘agree’ are all ‘equivalent’. Compare Trollope (2004), 168: ‘That is all very well; but is she to give any undertaking? ’ 10 On oaths, see Aquinas (1894), II f, q 89; S. Smith (2004), 186. , q 88; de Moor (1987), 109; Fried (1981), 40 ff. , an offer of a reward, are like oaths, and (in S. ) that they are like vows. 36 below. 11 For the same approach in the rhetorical tradition, see Skinner (1996), 108 f. 12 Some philosophers hold that all thinking consists of computations on sentences in the ‘language of thought’.