A Short History of Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to by Roger Scruton

By Roger Scruton

Notice for your self the pleasures of philosophy! Written either for the professional scholar of philosophy in addition to the overall reader, the popular author Roger Scruton offers a survey of recent philosophy. continuously enticing, Scruton takes us on a desirable travel of the topic, from founding father Descartes to crucial and well-known thinker of the 20 th century, Ludwig Wittgenstein. He identifies the entire relevant figures in addition to outlines of the most highbrow preoccupations that experience proficient western philosophy. portray a portrait of contemporary philosophy that's brilliant and lively, Scruton introduces us to a couple of the best philosophical difficulties invented during this interval and pursued ever seeing that. together with fabric on contemporary debates, a quick background of contemporary Philosophy is already demonstrated because the vintage creation. learn it and discover why.

Show description

Read Online or Download A Short History of Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Wittgenstein PDF

Best philosophy books

Historical Dictionary of Hume's Philosophy (Historical Dictionaries of Religions, Philosophies, and Movements Series, Volume 86)

The thinker David Hume used to be born in Edinburgh, Scotland on April 26, 1711. identified for his re-thinking of causation, morality, and faith, Hume has left a long-lasting mark on background. James Madison, the "father" of the U. S. structure, drew seriously on Hume's writing, specifically his "Idea of excellent Commonwealth," which combated the idea on the time that a huge nation couldn't maintain a republican kind of govt.

The Idea of Continental Philosophy

The belief of Continental Philosophy hasn't ever been competently defined in philosophical phrases. during this brief and interesting e-book Simon Glendinning makes an attempt ultimately to be triumphant the place others have failed--although now not by means of giving an account of its inner solidarity yet by way of displaying as a substitute why no such account could be given.

Introducing Ethics (A Graphic Guide)

What's the position of person selection and final result in a post-Holocaust global of continuous genocidal ethnic detoxing? Is "identity" now a last-ditch cultural protection of ethnic nationalisms and competing fundamentalisms? In a weather of fast info, unfastened markets and attainable ecological catastrophe, how will we outline "rights," self-interest and civic tasks?

The Philosophy of Schopenhauer (Continental European Philosophy)

Dale Jacquette charts the advance of Schopenhauer's principles from the time of his early dissertation at the Fourfold Root of the primary of adequate cause in the course of the variants of his magnum opus the area as Will and illustration to his later collections of philosophical aphorisms and pageant essays.

Extra resources for A Short History of Modern Philosophy: From Descartes to Wittgenstein

Example text

It does entail that everything is black or not black, but shades of grey are black or not black, 52 Tetralogue because they are not black. Logic also entails that everything is white or not white, but shades of grey are white or not white, because they are not white. Zac: Why not let me liberate you from your cold world of black and white, and grey, Roxana? Why not join me in my warm multi-coloured world where all the points of view of the rainbow clash harmoniously? Roxana: This one needs remedial lessons.

It’s not words like ‘true’ and ‘false’ that matter. They are just conveniences. Bob: Public ones? Sarah: Shut up, Bob. What matters is telling things as they are. Where we use the word ‘true’ in science, we could do without it if we had to, without significant gain or loss. ’ The main issue is the same. The words ‘true’ and ‘false’ are not what do the work. ‘It is false that some particles travel faster than the speed of light’ amounts to ‘No particles travel faster than the speed of light’. ’ Roxana: Some signs of intelligence at last.

I have to take a stand somewhere. I will say it outright. Witchcraft doesn’t work. Bob: That’s what you thought all along. Sarah: But I will also say outright: it is very probable that witchcraft doesn’t work. No more retreating for me. Zac: But you do sound like me, Sarah. First I put my point of view on the table. Then, while keeping it on the table (which is why it’s not a retreat, Bob), I also put on the table that it is my point of view. Sarah: The difference between us is that when you put on the table that what you first put on the table is your point of view, that’s a redundant move, because we were all taking for granted anyway that it was your point of view.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.49 of 5 – based on 31 votes